Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
663-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

663-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013451 50.867495)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013408 50.867490,-1.013410 50.867498,-1.013416 50.867506,-1.013425 50.867512,-1.013437 50.867516,-1.013450 50.867517,-1.013464 50.867516,-1.013476 50.867513,-1.013485 50.867507,-1.013491 50.867499,-1.013494 50.867491,-1.013492 50.867482,-1.013486 50.867475,-1.013477 50.867469,-1.013465 50.867465,-1.013452 50.867464,-1.013438 50.867465,-1.013426 50.867468,-1.013417 50.867474,-1.013411 50.867482,-1.013408 50.867490)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL